Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI8 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

AMD Radeon Instinct MI8 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI8 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI8 's Advantages
Lower TDP (175W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI8
8.192 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T +68%
13.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2016
Release Date
Jan 2021
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM
Memory Type
HBM2e
4096bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
7680
256
TMUs
240
64
ROPs
120
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
8 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

175W
TDP
500W
450 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy