Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI300X vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

AMD Radeon Instinct MI300X vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 192GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300X and 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5171GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
18880 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 750W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI300X +10752%
81.72 TFLOPS
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
Jun 2012
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2525 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

192GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
5171GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
304
Compute Units
-
19456
Shading Units
576
1216
TMUs
48
0
ROPs
32
1216
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.848 GPixel/s
2554 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.39 GTexel/s
653.7 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
81.72 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
753.4 GFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.39 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Aqua Vanjaram
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N14E-Q1-A2
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
153 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

750W
TDP
75W
1150 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy