Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and 2GB VRAM Quadro 2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 60W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile +766%
3.656 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000M
0.422 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Jan 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1575 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
192
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
GF106
-
GPU Variant
N12P-Q3
Turing
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Board Design

60W
TDP
55W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy