Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216

NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3000 Mobile and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG500 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 14% (1380MHz vs 1215MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 168.3GB/s)
3840 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P3000 Mobile
3.11 TFLOPS
Tesla PG500 216 +354%
14.13 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2017
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1088 MHz
Base Clock
1260 MHz
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
192bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

10
SM Count
80
-
Compute Units
-
1280
Shading Units
5120
80
TMUs
320
48
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

58.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
176.6 GPixel/s
97.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
441.6 GTexel/s
48.60 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
28.26 TFLOPS
3.110 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.13 TFLOPS
97.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.066 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
GV100
N17E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
7.0
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy