Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro M6000 24 GB and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock1114MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 16GB)
Lower TDP (250W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 317.4GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M6000 24 GB
6.844 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M +115%
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

988 MHz
Base Clock
-
1114 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
317.4GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
3072
Shading Units
8192
256
TMUs
256
96
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

106.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
285.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
6.844 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
213.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM200
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
GM200-880-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
8 billion
Transistors
8 billion
601 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
500W
600 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy