Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 2700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1098MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
592 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M +1006%
1.405 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2700M
0.127 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
6
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
48
40
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.480 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.72 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
127.2 GFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
G94
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM2
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
65W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy