Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1098MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
624 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 55W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M +3914%
1.405 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380
0.035 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Mar 2009
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
16
40
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.600 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
G96
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
34W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy