Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla M1060

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla M1060

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 2GB VRAM Tesla M1060 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1163MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
528 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 188W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000 +187%
1.786 TFLOPS
Tesla M1060
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Jun 2008
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
-
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
30
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
240
48
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GT200B
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
188W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy