Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

NVIDIA Quadro K4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Quadro K4000 and 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (80W vs 260W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 134.8GB/s)
3840 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4000
1.244 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive +1055%
14.38 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Aug 2018
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1305 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
1404 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
134.8GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
72
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
4608
64
TMUs
288
24
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
384 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

12.96 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
149.8 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
449.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.75 TFLOPS
1244 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.38 TFLOPS
51.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
449.3 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK106
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Board Design

80W
TDP
260W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy