Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA GRID K240Q

NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA GRID K240Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 and 1024MB VRAM GRID K240Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K240Q 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
1488 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
GRID K240Q +2019%
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
770 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.32GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

6
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
48
Shading Units
1536
16
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
108.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
GK104
GT216 GL
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

32W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.2
CUDA
3.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy