Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140

NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 and 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 75W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1950MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
976 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 140 +3598%
3.994 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1600 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1950 MHz
770 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
96bit
12.32GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s

Render Config

6
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
48
Shading Units
1024
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
8
-
L1 Cache
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
108.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
DG2-128
GT216 GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Board Design

32W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy