Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded

Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
6144 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1627MHz
Lower TDP (60W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M +121%
14.75 TFLOPS
RTX A1000 Embedded
6.664 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jan 2022
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1192 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1627 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
2048
256
TMUs
64
128
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
78.10 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.1 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.664 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.664 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
104.1 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GA107S
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
6 nm
Process Size
8 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
Unknown
406 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

500W
TDP
60W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy