Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID A100A vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

NVIDIA GRID A100A vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM GRID A100A and 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID A100A 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 672.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 61% (1620MHz vs 1005MHz)
Lower TDP (260W vs 400W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID A100A
13.89 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive +7%
14.93 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2020
Release Date
Aug 2018
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1230 MHz
1005 MHz
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
48GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
6144bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1866GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

108
SM Count
72
-
Compute Units
-
6912
Shading Units
4608
432
TMUs
288
192
ROPs
96
432
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

193.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
155.5 GPixel/s
434.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
466.6 GTexel/s
55.57 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.86 TFLOPS
13.89 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.93 TFLOPS
6.947 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
466.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
12 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Board Design

400W
TDP
260W
800 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
7.5
N/A
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy