Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID A100A vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

NVIDIA GRID A100A vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM GRID A100A and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID A100A 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
6528 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 12% (1124MHz vs 1005MHz)
Lower TDP (45W vs 400W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID A100A +1509%
13.89 TFLOPS
Quadro K620
0.863 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2020
Release Date
Jul 2014
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1058 MHz
1005 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR3
6144bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1866GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

108
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
6912
Shading Units
384
432
TMUs
24
192
ROPs
16
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

193.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
434.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.98 GTexel/s
55.57 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.89 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
6.947 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
GM107-850-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

400W
TDP
45W
800 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
5.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy