Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs NVIDIA GeForce 920M

NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs NVIDIA GeForce 920M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX350 and 2GB VRAM GeForce 920M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX350 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock937MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (56.06GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 33W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX350 +63%
1.199 TFLOPS
GeForce 920M
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2020
Release Date
Mar 2015
GeForce MX
Generation
GeForce 900M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

747 MHz
Base Clock
-
937 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
56.06GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

5
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

14.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
29.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
18.74 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1199 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
37.48 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
GK208B
GP107-670-A1 (N17S-G5-A1)
GPU Variant
N16V-GM
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²

Board Design

20W
TDP
33W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.5
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy