Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64

NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX350 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 64 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX350 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
Lower TDP (20W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 44% (1350MHz vs 937MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (402.4GB/s vs 56.06GB/s)
3456 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX350
1.199 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega 64 +822%
11.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2020
Release Date
Jun 2017
GeForce MX
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

747 MHz
Base Clock
1250 MHz
937 MHz
Boost Clock
1350 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
786 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
56.06GB/s
Bandwidth
402.4GB/s

Render Config

5
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
64
640
Shading Units
4096
32
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

14.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
29.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
345.6 GTexel/s
18.74 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
1199 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
37.48 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
691.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
Vega 10
GP107-670-A1 (N17S-G5-A1)
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 5.0
Samsung
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Board Design

20W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy