Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M

NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX350 and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 770M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX350 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 18% (937MHz vs 797MHz)
Lower TDP (20W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.19GB/s vs 56.06GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX350
1.199 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 770M +27%
1.53 TFLOPS
Blender
GeForce MX350 +7%
122
GeForce GTX 770M
114
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2020
Release Date
May 2013
GeForce MX
Generation
GeForce 700M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

747 MHz
Base Clock
706 MHz
937 MHz
Boost Clock
797 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
56.06GB/s
Bandwidth
96.19GB/s

Render Config

5
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
960
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB

Theoretical Performance

14.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
15.94 GPixel/s
29.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
63.76 GTexel/s
18.74 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1199 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.530 TFLOPS
37.48 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
63.76 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
GK106
GP107-670-A1 (N17S-G5-A1)
GPU Variant
N14E-GS-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Board Design

20W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy