Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1665MHz vs 1650MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 85W)
AMD Radeon Pro 5300 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
2.984 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 5300 +41%
4.224 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
Aug 2020
GeForce 16
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
20
896
Shading Units
1280
56
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
132.0 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.448 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.224 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
264.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Navi 14
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XE
Turing
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
7 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
85W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy