Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8700 vs NVIDIA NVS 315

ATI FirePro V8700 vs NVIDIA NVS 315

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V8700 and 1024MB VRAM NVS 315 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8700 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (108.8GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 315 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
Lower TDP (19W vs 151W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8700 +1100%
1.2 TFLOPS
NVS 315
0.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2008
Release Date
Mar 2013
FirePro
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
850 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
108.8GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
1
10
Compute Units
-
800
Shading Units
48
40
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
GF119
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Board Design

151W
TDP
19W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DMS-59
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy