Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A750 vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

Intel Arc A750 vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc A750 and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 225W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
Jan 2007
Alchemist
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x1

Clock Speeds

2050 MHz
Base Clock
-
2400 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
3584
Shading Units
-
224
TMUs
4
112
ROPs
4
448
Tensor Cores
-
28
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

268.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
537.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
34.41 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
17.20 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
RV516
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
6 nm
Process Size
80 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
32W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy