Home GPU Comparison AMD Instinct MI300X vs NVIDIA GRID K520

AMD Instinct MI300X vs NVIDIA GRID K520

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X and 4GB VRAM GRID K520 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
17920 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID K520 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 750W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
AMD Instinct MI300X +7038%
163.4 TFLOPS
GRID K520
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
Jul 2013
Instinct
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
5200 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

192GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
5300GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
304
Compute Units
-
19456
Shading Units
1536
880
TMUs
128
0
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
1300 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
163.4 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
81.7 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

MI300
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
146 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

750W
TDP
225W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy