RTX A500 Embedded vs Tesla C2090
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A500 Embedded Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 250W)
Tesla C2090 Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A500 Embedded
+310%
5468
Tesla C2090
1332
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
435 MHz
Base Clock
-
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s
Render Config
16
SM Count
16
2048
Shading Units
512
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
48
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
42.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
85.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
5.468 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.468 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
85.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
GF110
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
3 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
