RTX A500 Embedded vs Quadro K3000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded and 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A500 Embedded Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A500 Embedded
+626%
5468
Quadro K3000M
753
3DMark Time Spy
RTX A500 Embedded
+430%
2628
Quadro K3000M
495
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
435 MHz
Base Clock
-
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s
Render Config
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
576
64
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
42.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.848 GPixel/s
85.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.39 GTexel/s
5.468 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.468 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
753.4 GFLOPS
85.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.39 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
75W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N14E-Q1-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
