RTX A500 Embedded vs Tesla S2050
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded and 3GB VRAM Tesla S2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A500 Embedded Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
1600 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 900W)
Tesla S2050 Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (148.4GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A500 Embedded
+431%
5468
Tesla S2050
1028
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
435 MHz
Base Clock
-
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
773 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
148.4GB/s
Render Config
16
SM Count
14
2048
Shading Units
448
64
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
48
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
42.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
85.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
5.468 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.468 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
85.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
900W
-
Suggested PSU
1300 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
GF100
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
