Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison RTX A500 Embedded vs Data Center GPU Max 1100

RTX A500 Embedded vs Data Center GPU Max 1100

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded and 48GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

RTX A500 Embedded Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 300W)
Data Center GPU Max 1100 Advantages
Released 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (1550MHz vs 1335MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A500 Embedded
5468
Data Center GPU Max 1100 +306%
22220

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

435 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
7168
64
TMUs
448
32
ROPs
0
64
Tensor Cores
448
16
RT Cores
56
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
204 MB

Theoretical Performance

42.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
85.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
694.4 GTexel/s
5.468 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
22.22 TFLOPS
5.468 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.22 TFLOPS
85.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.22 TFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin

Graphics Processor

GA107S
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.5
Samsung
Foundry
Intel
8 nm
Process Size
10 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
100 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net