RTX A500 Embedded vs Quadro 2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded and 2GB VRAM Quadro 2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A500 Embedded Advantages
Released 11 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 55W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A500 Embedded
+1195%
5468
Quadro 2000M
422
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Jan 2011
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
435 MHz
Base Clock
-
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
16
SM Count
4
2048
Shading Units
192
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
42.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
85.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
5.468 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.468 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
85.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
55W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
GF106
-
GPU Variant
N12P-Q3
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
