Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs T600 Max Q

RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs T600 Max Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM T600 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 44% (2010MHz vs 1395MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
T600 Max Q Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +394%
12350
T600 Max Q
2500

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Quadro Turing-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

24
SM Count
14
3072
Shading Units
896
96
TMUs
56
48
ROPs
32
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.64 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
78.12 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.000 TFLOPS
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.500 TFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.12 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
40W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
TU117
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net