Home
Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 151% (2010MHz vs 800MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+1106%
12350
Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition
1024
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
May 2015
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
775 MHz
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
800 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
640
96
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
16
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.80 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.00 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1024 GFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
64.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
Unknown
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
Tropo
-
GPU Variant
Tropo XT
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)