RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs Radeon HD 6670A
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 6670A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2592 additional rendering cores
Radeon HD 6670A Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+2044%
12350
Radeon HD 6670A
576
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Apr 2011
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
All-In-One
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
480
96
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
8
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.40 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
576.0 GFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
45W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
Turks
-
GPU Variant
Turks XT
(215-0803000)
(215-0803000)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0