Home
Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 174.7GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+231%
12350
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition
3723
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
May 2015
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
2048
96
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
32
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.09 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
116.4 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.723 TFLOPS
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.723 TFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
232.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
250W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
Amethyst
-
GPU Variant
Amethyst XT
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
5 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3
