RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs Mobility FireGL V5725
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 256MB VRAM Mobility FireGL V5725 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation Advantages
Released 14 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2952 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+7476%
12350
Mobility FireGL V5725
163
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2009
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Mobility FireGL
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
3
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
120
96
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.720 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.440 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
163.2 GFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
Unknown
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
M86
-
GPU Variant
M86-ME XT GL
(216-0683010)
(216-0683010)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.378 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
135 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
