Home
Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs GeForce RTX 3050 Max Q Refresh
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs GeForce RTX 3050 Max Q Refresh
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 Max Q Refresh to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation Advantages
Released 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 103% (2010MHz vs 990MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 144.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+204%
12350
GeForce RTX 3050 Max Q Refresh
4055
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jul 2022
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 30 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
622 MHz
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
990 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
16
3072
Shading Units
2048
96
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
96
Tensor Cores
64
24
RT Cores
16
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.68 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
63.36 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.055 TFLOPS
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.055 TFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
63.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
75W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GA107
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
5 nm
Process Size
8 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
Unknown
159 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.6
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
