RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs GeForce G103M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM GeForce G103M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation Advantages
Released 13 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
3064 additional rendering cores
GeForce G103M Advantages
Lower TDP (14W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+47400%
12350
GeForce G103M
26
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Sep 2009
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 100M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
1
3072
Shading Units
8
96
TMUs
4
48
ROPs
4
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.560 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.560 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
14W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
G98
-
GPU Variant
N10M-GE2-S
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
