RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs FirePro M3900
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2912 additional rendering cores
FirePro M3900 Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+5045%
12350
FirePro M3900
240
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Oct 2010
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
160
96
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.000 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.000 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
20W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
Seymour
-
GPU Variant
Seymour GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.37 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0