RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs GeForce 8800M GTX
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8800M GTX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation Advantages
Released 15 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
2976 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 65W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+5045%
12350
GeForce 8800M GTX
240
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Nov 2007
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 8M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
12
3072
Shading Units
96
96
TMUs
48
48
ROPs
16
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
65W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
NB8E-GTX-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
