RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs Arc A350M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM Arc A350M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation Advantages
Released 1 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 75% (2010MHz vs 1150MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Arc A350M Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+599%
12350
Arc A350M
1766
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
768
96
TMUs
48
48
ROPs
24
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
6
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.60 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.20 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.533 TFLOPS
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.766 TFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
441.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
25W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
6 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
