Radeon Instinct MI250 vs Quadro NVS 135M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 135M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Instinct MI250 Advantages
Released 14 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 9.504GB/s)
13296 additional rendering cores
Quadro NVS 135M Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250
+173976%
45260
Quadro NVS 135M
26
Graphics Card
Nov 2021
Release Date
May 2007
Radeon Instinct
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
594 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
9.504GB/s
Render Config
208
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
13312
Shading Units
16
832
TMUs
8
0
ROPs
4
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
1414 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
362.1 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
45.26 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
45.26 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
500W
TDP
10W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Aldebaran
GPU Name
G86
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
G86-621-A2
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
80 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
Unknown
Die Size
127 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0
