Radeon Instinct MI250 vs Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 and 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Instinct MI250 Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (1700MHz vs 1650MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
12416 additional rendering cores
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250
+1430%
45260
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
2957
Graphics Card
Nov 2021
Release Date
Jun 2020
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1395 MHz
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
208
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
13312
Shading Units
896
832
TMUs
56
0
ROPs
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
1414 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.40 GTexel/s
362.1 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.914 TFLOPS
45.26 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.957 TFLOPS
45.26 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
50W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Aldebaran
GPU Name
TU117B
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
N19P-Q1-A1
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
Unknown
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
N/A
Shader Model
6.6
