Quadro P1000 vs Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro P1000 and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P1000 Advantages
Lower TDP (47W vs 2400W)
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1600MHz vs 1480MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
15744 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P1000
1894
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+2668%
52430
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1266 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1565 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
3205GB/s
Render Config
5
SM Count
-
640
Shading Units
16384
40
TMUs
1024
32
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB
Theoretical Performance
47.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
29.60 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
59.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS
Board Design
47W
TDP
2400W
200 W
Suggested PSU
2800 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
GP107-860-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 12.5
Samsung
Foundry
Intel
14 nm
Process Size
10 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
100 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
