Quadro P1000 vs Quadro K5100M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro P1000 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P1000 Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 92% (1480MHz vs 771MHz)
Lower TDP (47W vs 100W)
Quadro K5100M Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P1000
1894
Quadro K5100M
+25%
2369
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro P1000
+23%
1572
Quadro K5100M
1273
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro P1000
+44%
733
Quadro K5100M
507
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1266 MHz
Base Clock
771 MHz
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
5
SM Count
-
640
Shading Units
1536
40
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
47.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.67 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
98.69 GTexel/s
29.60 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.369 TFLOPS
59.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
98.69 GFLOPS
Board Design
47W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
GK104
GP107-860-A1
GPU Variant
N15E-Q5-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
