Quadro K2000 vs Data Center GPU Flex 170
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K2000 Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 150W)
Data Center GPU Flex 170 Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
733
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+2190%
16790
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
384
Shading Units
4096
32
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
128
-
RT Cores
32
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
51W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
DG2-512
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
