Quadro FX 3450 vs GeForce RTX 4070 GDDR6
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 3450 and 12GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4070 GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 3450 Advantages
Lower TDP (83W vs 200W)
GeForce RTX 4070 GDDR6 Advantages
Released 19 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2475MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
5888 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jul 2005
Release Date
Aug 2024
Quadro FX Curie
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1920 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2475 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
480.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
46
-
Shading Units
5888
12
TMUs
184
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
36 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
158.4 GPixel/s
5.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
455.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.15 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
29.15 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
455.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
83W
TDP
200W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
NV41
GPU Name
AD104
NV41 GL
GPU Variant
AD104-2XX-A1
Curie
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.19 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
225 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
2.1 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
3.0
Shader Model
6.8
