Quadro FX 3450 vs TITAN X Pascal
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 3450 and 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 3450 Advantages
Lower TDP (83W vs 250W)
TITAN X Pascal Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jul 2005
Release Date
Aug 2016
Quadro FX Curie
Generation
GeForce 10
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1417 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1531 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1251 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5X
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
480.4GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
28
-
Shading Units
3584
12
TMUs
224
8
ROPs
96
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
3 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
147.0 GPixel/s
5.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
342.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
171.5 GFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
10.97 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
342.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
83W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
NV41
GPU Name
GP102
NV41 GL
GPU Variant
GP102-400-A1
Curie
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.19 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
225 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
2.1 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
3.0
Shader Model
6.4
