Quadro 400 vs RTX A1000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 and 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro 400 Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 60W)
RTX A1000 Embedded Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1627MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
2000 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 400
108
RTX A1000 Embedded
+6070%
6664
Graphics Card
Apr 2011
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1192 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1627 MHz
770 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.32GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
6
SM Count
16
48
Shading Units
2048
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
78.10 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.664 TFLOPS
108.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.664 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
104.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
60W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
GA107S
GT216 GL
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
Unknown
100 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
