Quadro 400 vs GRID A100A
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 and 48GB VRAM GRID A100A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro 400 Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 400W)
GRID A100A Advantages
Released 9 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
6864 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 400
108
GRID A100A
+12761%
13890
Graphics Card
Apr 2011
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
770 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
12.32GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s
Render Config
6
SM Count
108
48
Shading Units
6912
16
TMUs
432
8
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
108.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
400W
200 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
GA100
GT216 GL
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
8.0
4.1
Shader Model
N/A