Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Pro Graphics P6300 and 0 VRAM Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Iris Pro Graphics P6300 Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 65W)
Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile Advantages
Released 9 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 175% (2200MHz vs 800MHz)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Pro Graphics P6300
614
Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile
+542%
3942
Graphics Card
Sep 2014
Release Date
Dec 2023
HD Graphics-W
Generation
Arc Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
800 MHz
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Dependent
Bandwidth
Render Config
384
Shading Units
896
48
TMUs
56
6
ROPs
24
Theoretical Performance
4.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
123.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.885 TFLOPS
614.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.942 TFLOPS
153.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
15W
TDP
65W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Graphics Processor
Broadwell GT3e
GPU Name
Meteor Lake GT1
Generation 8.0
Architecture
Xe-LPG
Intel
Foundry
Intel
14 nm
Process Size
10 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.0
Vulkan
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
