Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Jetson Nano GPU
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Plus Graphics 640 and 0System Shared VRAM Jetson Nano GPU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Iris Plus Graphics 640 Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 19% (1100MHz vs 921MHz)
256 additional rendering cores
Jetson Nano GPU Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
Lower TDP (10W vs 15W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Plus Graphics 640
+258%
845
Jetson Nano GPU
236
Graphics Card
Jan 2017
Release Date
May 2019
HD Graphics-M
Generation
Tegra
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
IGP
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
640 MHz
1100 MHz
Boost Clock
921 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
384
Shading Units
128
48
TMUs
16
6
ROPs
16
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.74 GPixel/s
52.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.74 GTexel/s
1.690 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
471.6 GFLOPS
844.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
235.8 GFLOPS
211.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.368 GFLOPS
Board Design
15W
TDP
10W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
Kaby Lake GT3e
GPU Name
GM20B
-
GPU Variant
TM660M-A2
Generation 9.5
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm++
Process Size
20 nm
Unknown
Transistors
2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
5.3
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
