Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Arc 140T Mobile
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Plus Graphics 640 and 0System Shared VRAM Arc 140T Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Iris Plus Graphics 640 Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 35W)
Arc 140T Mobile Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 114% (2350MHz vs 1100MHz)
640 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Plus Graphics 640
845
Arc 140T Mobile
+469%
4813
3DMark Time Spy
Iris Plus Graphics 640
515
Arc 140T Mobile
+679%
4012
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Iris Plus Graphics 640
233
Arc 140T Mobile
+752%
1986
Graphics Card
Jan 2017
Release Date
Jan 2025
HD Graphics-M
Generation
Arc Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1100 MHz
Boost Clock
2350 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
384
Shading Units
1024
48
TMUs
64
6
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
8
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.20 GPixel/s
52.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.4 GTexel/s
1.690 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
9.626 TFLOPS
844.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.813 TFLOPS
211.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1203 GFLOPS
Board Design
15W
TDP
35W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Graphics Processor
Kaby Lake GT3e
GPU Name
Arrow Lake
Generation 9.5
Architecture
Xe2-LPG
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm++
Process Size
3 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
