GeForce RTX 4050 Max Q vs GeForce MX330
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 Max Q and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX330 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 4050 Max Q Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1605MHz vs 1594MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 56.06GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
GeForce MX330 Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 35W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4050 Max Q
+571%
8218
GeForce MX330
1224
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
Feb 2020
GeForce 40 Mobile
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
1531 MHz
1605 MHz
Boost Clock
1594 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
56.06GB/s
Render Config
20
SM Count
3
2560
Shading Units
384
80
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
16
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
77.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.50 GPixel/s
128.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.26 GTexel/s
8.218 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
19.13 GFLOPS
8.218 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1224 GFLOPS
128.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
38.26 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
10W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GP108
GN21-X2
GPU Variant
GP108-655-A1
(N17S-G3-A1)
(N17S-G3-A1)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
5 nm
Process Size
14 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
6.1
6.8
Shader Model
6.4
