Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison GeForce RTX 4050 Max Q vs RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

GeForce RTX 4050 Max Q vs RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 Max Q and 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce RTX 4050 Max Q Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 150W)
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1680MHz vs 1605MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
7168 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4050 Max Q
8218
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 +297%
32690

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 40 Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1605 MHz
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

20
SM Count
76
2560
Shading Units
9728
80
TMUs
304
48
ROPs
112
80
Tensor Cores
304
20
RT Cores
76
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

77.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
188.2 GPixel/s
128.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
510.7 GTexel/s
8.218 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
32.69 TFLOPS
8.218 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.69 TFLOPS
128.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
510.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
150W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
AD103
GN21-X2
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
5 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.9
6.8
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net